|
 
UNESCO Office Beijing
International Advanced Training Workshop on Integrated River Basin
Management
IRTCES, Beijing, China July 27 to August 3, 2009
Form
for Training Evaluation by Participants
Instructions:
Be as objective and sincere as possible.
Base your opinion on the overall performance rather than isolated
incidents.
Consider each question independently
Indicate your answer by crossing (X) the appropriate box
Followings answers were given by 36 participants.
1.
The lectures and course material were well prepared.
|
Excellent (10) |
Very Good (8) |
Good (6) |
Fair (4) |
Poor (2) |
No Opinion (0) |
|
21 |
11 |
2 |
|
|
|
2.
The instructors communicated clearly and effectively.
|
Excellent (10) |
Very Good (8) |
Good (6) |
Fair (4) |
Poor (2) |
No Opinion (0) |
|
11 |
19 |
5 |
1 |
|
|
3.
The instructors have motivated us to learn more about the subject.
|
Excellent (10) |
Very Good (8) |
Good (6) |
Fair (4) |
Poor (2) |
No Opinion (0) |
|
20 |
11 |
4 |
1 |
|
|
4.
The facilities available for the conduct of the course were good.
|
Excellent (10) |
Very Good (8) |
Good (6) |
Fair (4) |
Poor (2) |
No Opinion (0) |
|
21 |
10 |
4 |
1 |
|
|
5.
I gained a good understanding of the concept/principles in this
filed.
|
Excellent (10) |
Very Good (8) |
Good (6) |
Fair (4) |
Poor (2) |
No Opinion (0) |
|
20 |
10 |
6 |
|
|
|
6.
The topics chosen for the course were relevant and useful.
|
Excellent (10) |
Very Good (8) |
Good (6) |
Fair (4) |
Poor (2) |
No Opinion (0) |
|
18 |
13 |
5 |
|
|
|
7.
The practical / laboratory exercises was sufficient.
|
Excellent (10) |
Very Good (8) |
Good (6) |
Fair (4) |
Poor (2) |
No Opinion (0) |
|
12 |
7 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
2 |
8.
The instructors appear to have through knowledge of the subject.
|
Excellent (10) |
Very Good (8) |
Good (6) |
Fair (4) |
Poor (2) |
No Opinion (0) |
|
19 |
13 |
4 |
|
|
|
9.
The coordinators were friendly and helpful.
|
Excellent (10) |
Very Good (8) |
Good (6) |
Fair (4) |
Poor (2) |
No Opinion (0) |
|
29 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
10.
Hospitality, including boarding and lodging, was good.
|
Excellent (10) |
Very Good (8) |
Good (6) |
Fair (4) |
Poor (2) |
No Opinion (0) |
|
19 |
15 |
2 |
|
|
|
11. Overall, the organization and conduct of the course were
good.
|
Excellent (10) |
Very Good (8) |
Good (6) |
Fair (4) |
Poor (2) |
No Opinion (0) |
|
17 |
16 |
3 |
|
|
|
12. Interaction among the other participants to develop further
collaboration
|
Excellent (10) |
Very Good (8) |
Good (6) |
Fair (4) |
Poor (2) |
No Opinion (0) |
|
13 |
17 |
6 |
|
|
|
13. Do you recommend that the course be conducted in future
YES NO
36
0
|